[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main In Press Current Issue All Issues Search register ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Editorial Board::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Editorial Policy::
Registration::
Contact us::
::
..
Indexing

 

 

 

 

 
..
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
Creative commons

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

..
:: Volume 4, Issue 2 (Summer 2004) ::
J Ardabil Univ Med Sci 2004, 4(2): 7-12 Back to browse issues page
Evaluation of Research Methodology in Ardabil University of Medical Sciences
Nayereh Aminisani * , Seyedhashem Sezavar , Rasool Lotfollahzadeh , Nazila Vosogh
, jarums@arums.ac.ir
Abstract:   (7640 Views)

 Background & Objectives: Research has always been considered as a powerful tool in creating change and development and like any other process it demands careful planning, providing facilities and special resources. Investigating research trends can pave the way for systematic thinking in this regard. This study was conducted to examine trends in research methodology in order to promote the research quality in Ardabil University of Medical Sciences.

 Methods: In this cross-sectional descriptive study, data regarding research methodology and its administration was evaluated by a questionnaire during six years from 1997 to 2003. The data regarding the author of the research were collected through the interview. These data were then analyzed by SPSS software (release 12) using descriptive statistics.

 Results: Between 1997 and 2003, 196 research proposals were approved. The number of research designs increased from 3 to 45 during this period. Most of these studies (58.2%) had cross-sectional design. The experimental researches came second with 43 cases (21.9%). During this period the number of trials and analytic studies increased, but descriptive studies were still in the highest rank. Only 32% of the proposals were completed properly and in most of the cases they were not completed in the proper way and some subsections of the forms such as design, variable table, methods of data analysis, data collection procedures and administration problems were incomplete or missing in most of the designs. These problems were more evident before the establishment of research consultation office in 2001. 75% of the researchers had attended research workshop before conducting any research.

  Conclusion: The findings indicated a remarkable increase in the number of researches compared to the preceding years. Moreover, they have been more analytically-oriented. However, descriptive researches are in the top rank. Some necessary measures have to be taken in order to improve the present condition.

Keywords: Methodology, Research, Research Proposal
Full-Text [PDF 137 kb]   (2027 Downloads)    
Type of Study: article | Subject: Special
Received: 2002/08/6 | Accepted: 2003/12/13 | Published: 2004/11/3
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA


XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Aminisani N, Sezavar S, Lotfollahzadeh R, Vosogh N. Evaluation of Research Methodology in Ardabil University of Medical Sciences. J Ardabil Univ Med Sci 2004; 4 (2) :7-12
URL: http://jarums.arums.ac.ir/article-1-488-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 4, Issue 2 (Summer 2004) Back to browse issues page
مجله دانشگاه علوم پزشکی اردبیل Journal of Ardabil University of Medical Sciences
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.15 seconds with 39 queries by YEKTAWEB 4623