[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main In Press Current Issue All Issues Search register ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Editorial Board::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Editorial Policy::
Registration::
Contact us::
indexing and abstracting::
::
..
Indexing

 

 

 

 

 
..
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
Creative commons

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

..
:: Search published articles ::
Showing 2 results for Pain Management

Vadood Norouzi , Eiraj Feizy , Firooz Amani , Pouneh Zamani ,
Volume 6, Issue 4 (12-2006)
Abstract

 Background & Objectives: Pain acts as a defensive mechanism of body, which occurs following tissue damage. It is expected in surgical wounds. With regard to negative clinical outcomes resulting from surgery pain, this study was conducted to investigate the quality of pain control after appendectomy.

 Methods: In this descriptive, cross- sectional and prospective study, 200 patients undergoing appendectomy were randomly selected. Pain control in all of the patients was managed for 8 hours using narcotics injected intramuscularly. The patients were studied during 12 hours after surgery. The rating scale of 0-10 grade was used to estimate pain severity. The collected data were analysed by SPSS.

 Results: From 200 patients experiencing appendectomy, 101 (50.5%) were female and 99 (49.5%) were male. Pain was controlled with pethidine, methadon and pentazocin in 123 (61.5%), 51 (25.5%) and 26 (13%) patients, respectively. In 98 (49%) patients there was severe pain following the surgery. The most severe pain belonged to 21 (80.7%) patients who received pentazocin.

 Conclusions: With regard to multiple complications and problems resulting from pain after appendectomy, careful control of pain and more attention is necessary.


Mohsen Salehi, Alireza Zeraatchi, Farzaneh Karamitanha, Gholamreza Hamidkholgh,
Volume 25, Issue 2 (7-2025)
Abstract

Background: Effective management of acute pain in patients with long-bone fractures is essential for comfort and procedural facilitation. While intravenous morphine is the gold standard for pain relief, it is associated with significant adverse effects. This study investigates the efficacy and safety of nebulized fentanyl as a noninvasive alternative to intravenous morphine in managing acute pain from long-bone fractures, alongside assessing patient satisfaction.
Methods: In a randomized, double-masked clinical trial conducted in the Emergency Department, 240 patients aged 20–50 years with long-bone fractures and visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores greater than five were randomly assigned to receive either nebulized fentanyl (4 µg/kg) or intravenous morphine (0.1 mg/kg). Pain scores were recorded at baseline and at 5, 10, 15, 30, and 60 minutes after the intervention. Secondary outcomes included the need for rescue analgesia, adverse effects, and patient satisfaction, which were analyzed statistically using a significance level of α = 0.05.
Results: At 5 minutes, the pain intensity difference between groups was Δ5 = x5 units (95% CI: [L5, U5]), and at 60 minutes, Δ60 = x60 units (95% CI: [L60, U60]). The need for rescue analgesia showed numeric differences at 15 and 30 minutes. Nausea/vomiting were more prevalent in the morphine group. Patient satisfaction was comparable between the two groups.
Conclusion: Both nebulized fentanyl and intravenous morphine are effective for acute pain relief, though morphine offers superior early relief. Nebulized fentanyl presents a viable alternative with fewer systemic side effects.


Page 1 from 1     

مجله دانشگاه علوم پزشکی اردبیل Journal of Ardabil University of Medical Sciences
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.08 seconds with 28 queries by YEKTAWEB 4623