[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
:: Volume 2, Issue 3 (Autumn 2002) ::
J Ardabil Univ Med Sci 2002, 2(3): 34-40 Back to browse issues page
Standard vs. Two- Stage Method of Perineal Repair: Comparing
Afrooz Mardi , Nayereh Aminisani
Abstract:   (5658 Views)

  Background & Objective : Several studies have introduced different methods to facilitate the fetal expulsion. One of these methods is episiotomy during the second stage of labor followed by instant repair of episiotomy incision. Perineal repair, its different methods and the outcomes have long been a matter of discussion and research. This study was performed in order to compare results of two different methods of perineal repair, namely standard (three stage) and two-stage method (leaving the skin unsutured).

  Methods : This study is a randomized clinical trial in which, 80 mothers were selected continuously and divided randomly into the two stage and three stage repair groups. A scaled pain ruler, a questionnaire and information checklist were used to collect the data. The setting of this study was the labor room, the postpartum unit and subjects’ homes.

  Results : The finding of this study showed no significant difference between the outcomes of the two groups in terms of perineal pain in the first 4-6 hours, the 2nd day, 15th and 21st day, incision recovery on the 15th and 21st day, dyspareunia and the first postpartum pain-free intercourse.

  Conclusions : The findings of this research indicated that the results obtained from the two above-mentioned methods are not significantly different. However, since the two stage method requires spending less time and energy and reduces the time that mothers should stay in labor room, it is suggested to be used as one of the perineal repair methods.

Keywords: Episiotomy, Perineal repair, Standard method, Two stage method
Full-Text [PDF 1553 kb]   (1022 Downloads)    
Type of Study: article | Subject: Special
Received: 2001/04/8 | Accepted: 2003/02/17 | Published: 2003/03/1
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA


XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Mardi A, Aminisani N. Standard vs. Two- Stage Method of Perineal Repair: Comparing . J Ardabil Univ Med Sci. 2002; 2 (3) :34-40
URL: http://jarums.arums.ac.ir/article-1-555-en.html


Volume 2, Issue 3 (Autumn 2002) Back to browse issues page
مجله دانشگاه علوم پزشکی اردبیل Journal of Ardabil University of Medical Sciences
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.09 seconds with 32 queries by YEKTAWEB 3925